“Anthony Fauci: The Consummate Unelected, Unaccountable, Technocrat”

Wikimedia Commons, The White House

Also see:

Unmasking Freedom:

…They have trained us to be afraid of each other, to wear masks, to keep social distance, or even better, to stay home. They prefer it this way, with us locked away, out of their way, ordering things by Internet and forfeiting our homes to digital debt collectors. A junkie would sooner part with his syringe than they would drop their lockdowns. For a while, we entertained the hope that they might end their morbid preoccupation with our health after a month or two. Now we know better.

Even if they decide that Covid-19 was eradicated, they have the next virus already lined up. There is a worthy candidate, a new strain of swine flu called G4 and they have great hopes that it has the potential for triggering a pandemic. If it fails the test (as all the predecessors did) they will find another one, don’t worry. The law of supply and demand is on their side. There are so many viruses, and so many gullible people who are pathologically unable to doubt whatever the New York Times says, that this music will never end.

The First Wave is history; the Second Wave is upon us…

The COVID-19 “Pandemic” – An Independent Investigation:

1.1     COVID-19 Assumptions and Claims

Now let us apply some logic to the current situation. The claim is that an assumed-to-be deadly infectious virus has spread across the world, from Wuhan, China and we need to take steps to stop the effects and prevent the spread of the disease.

1. It is alleged, a test can detect the infectious “novel virus” – SARS-CoV-2. This claim is based on the use of a “PCR test.”
2. This novel virus has killed tens of thousands of  people (or more) worldwide.
3. The SARS-CoV-2 virus is highly infectious.
4. The SARS-CoV-2 virus is therefore dangerous – even fatal – and so extreme measures must be taken to deal with the threat…

[…]

Logic dictates that if we were to call into question any or all of these  claims, we must also call into question the claims of a pandemic. Further, if the pandemic claims are unfounded, governments must withdraw/reverse measures which are claimed to mitigate the effects or magnitude of the alleged pandemic…

****

“The men the American people admire most extravagantly are the most daring liars; the men they detest most violently are those who try to tell them the truth.”

― H.L. Mencken

****

Here are three more articles revealing the most despotic and heinous baldfaced lie ever to be foisted upon humanity: COVID-19. And yet, the vast majority remain willfully-ignorant, insouciant and completely compliant/obedient to this scientific dictatorship, which is supported and enabled by the very government officials they, supposedly, voted into office.

Speaking to the vast majority now, your government has lied to you in every way possible, since you were nursing on mother’s milk: including the entire history of the US of A, and in particular, the civil war, WW I, Pearl Harbor, WW II, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Korea, Laos, Vietnam and “9-11”, just to name a few. Of course, you have no idea of what I am referring to here, and even if you did, you would shove your head in the sand (or up your ass), in order to avoid the one thing you hate and fear most: THE HARD, DIFFICULT TRUTH (REALITY)!

So it is no wonder that you are more than willing to go down to Big Brother hell, being the herd of cattle, the flock of sheep, you are and have always been. To steal a quote from National Lampoon’s ANIMAL HOUSE: “Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life!”

If there be a history left for humankind, and truly honest historians are finally raised up, you will be one of the great anomalies these future historians will struggle with: these historians will discover a people (a herd of two legged cattle) who continually blathered on and on about being free, and living in “the land of the free”, while being anything but naturally free.

{Americans have never been naturally free, since their freedom is a political form of freedom; their freedom has been granted them by the lowlife scum powers that be (who in reality, have no natural power to grant or rescind freedom). And political freedom can be rescinded as easily as it was granted; which has been in plain view since 9-11, and now, with this ‘pandemic’ bullshit, it is even more evident that political freedom is not natural freedom, in any way, shape or form. Any so called ‘freedom’ that can be rescinded (taken away) is not natural freedom, which all of us were born with. If only the herd would awaken to this truth and embrace it.}

You make no sense, because you have been raised up like Pavlov’s dog, you salivate and slobber every time your beloved ‘leaders’ ring the FEAR bell; you are quite satisfied and content to exist as an animal that is fully dependent on a few inbred psychopaths for everything. Mommy and daddy have been dead for decades now, and you still can’t function as an adult individual. And so now, all the rest of us are stuck, with you, in this Big Brother-like nanny-police state, which is your ultimate wet-dream.

You are pathetic, and you deserve “the new normal” world-order you are about to receive (see here). Whereas the rest of us and our families, the only true minority, do not deserve this totalitarian hell on earth (New York Issues Subpoenas for Contact Tracing; Smartphones Add CV Logging Feature), which will come to fruition, in the coming months and years, if nothing is done to stop these inbred, Anglo-Zionist  psychopaths:

Anthony Fauci: The Consummate Unelected, Unaccountable, Technocrat

POSTED BY: WESLEY J. SMITH VIA EPOCH TIMES JULY 2, 2020

Wesley Smith correctly points out that freedom at the hands of Technocrats is an oxymoron. Science should properly advise political leaders, but it has no ability to determine or create public policy and should not be allowed to dominate it. ⁃ TN Editor
In recent months, as a vicious pandemic spread out of China, an emerging technocracy—rule by experts—threatened to seize control of much of our public life.

When National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci and other infectious disease specialists instructed us to self-isolate, President Donald Trump “shut it [the economy] down.”

Governors issued executive orders shuttering restaurants and hair salons. Mayors banned private gatherings. Funerals—even at the graveside—became grieving ceremonies that most were forbidden to attend. As for beaches and public parks, they became ghost zones.

The policy purpose behind our national quasi-home arrest was to “flatten the curve” of new COVID-19 cases to keep hospitals from being overwhelmed—as happened terrifyingly in Northern Italy. Whether or not our insipidly termed “alone together” national isolation was effective—I think it probably was—we can all give thanks that hospitals did not collapse, and draconian triage measures such as Italy imposed were never required.

But that laudable success came at a terrible toll. Tens of millions were thrown out of work. Despite concerted government efforts to shore up the economy, the small-business sector imploded—some shops and restaurants never to reopen. Uber and taxi drivers lost countless fares. Parking lot attendants and airport shop workers became unemployed. Major corporations faced bankruptcy.

Greater Control
One would have thought that the legal lockdowns were sufficiently restrictive. But once power has been tasted, the human tendency is to grab for ever greater control.

Soon, media pundits and politicians began to refer ominously to a less vibrant, prosperous, and free “new normal.” Flattening the curve quickly metamorphosed from a temporary measure to save hospitals into a permanent effort to prevent anyone from getting sick.

“Experts,” such as the bioethicist Ezekiel Emanuel—a prime architect of the Affordable Care Act—told us with presumed authority, that we could not return to the way things were until a vaccine was developed, a time Emanuel estimated to be potentially as long as 18 months.

Justifying seizing greater control under the mantra, “if it saves just one life,” some of our most influential experts began pounding the drum to make a future COVID-19 vaccine mandatory for everyone. A committee of the New York Bar Association urged the organization to support legislation toward that end.

Harvard law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz went so far as to tell an interviewer that “the state has the power to literally take you to a doctor’s office and plunge a needle into your arm.”

Mask Confusion
Then, there was the less-intrusive question of masks. Initially, Fauci opined that masks did little good and should mainly be worn by health care providers. But soon, the CDC changed its guidelines urging that we all wear cloth coverings in public places. Most of us went along. Better safe than sorry, after all. We wanted to do our part.

But voluntary submission wasn’t enough for our would-be overlords. Many urged the passage of legal mandates. In a co-authored New York Times op-ed, Emanuel—sniffing that “face mask compliance this side of the Pacific has been uneven”—urged that wearing masks be made mandatory.

To avoid a popular “backlash,” Emanuel implored our neo-patrician entertainment celebrities, sports stars, and politicians to model mask-wearing as a means of normalizing it among us plebeians. Some governors promptly saluted and issued mandatory “wear masks” orders.

Are these mask mandates medically necessary? According to the latest “science,” for most of us, it would seem not, most of the time. For example, a report recently published by the New England Journal of Medicine discussing masking in the health care facility context, also contained illuminating information about our general circumstances:

“We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to COVID-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic COVID-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal.”

Oops. Then, what might be the point of wearing masks when it is not an effective prophylactic? “Expanded masking protocols’ greatest contribution,” the scientist wrote, “may be to reduce the transmission of anxiety.”

The World Health Organization appeared to strike another blow against the necessity of imposing technocratic mandates when a WHO scientist stated that transmission by asymptomatic patients “is very rare.” That would mean that the number of potential transmitters of the virus at any given time is far lower than originally thought, which has great public policy implications.

Apparently, the technocratic class understood that potential, too. The next day, after much establishment screaming, the scientist took back her “very rare” characterization, now saying that about 16 percent of infected people are asymptomatic and “able to transmit the virus.” (WHO’s confusion—another WHO “expert” said, “There is much that is not known”—doesn’t change the point of this essay, but it does raise the question of whether we can trust “the experts,” considering the part played by political pressure in such pronouncements. But that is a question that will have to wait for another essay.)

Technocracy Temptation

These shifts in—and befuddled utterances about—our scientific understanding should staunch the drive for technocratic mandates. Our leaders don’t rule. They govern. Other than in circumstances of close personal contact over extended time in health care facilities and other risky places, legally requiring masks—when it provides scant prophylactic benefit—would be merely to harness the power of symbolism as an outward manifestation of obedience to the technocratic order. That isn’t a proper purpose of public policy.

Read full story here…

Source: Anthony Fauci: The Consummate Unelected, Unaccountable, Technocrat