Dr Andrew Kaufman on the Frankenstein synthetic biology paper in 2007 that preceded current vaccine events:
Dr Kaufman: ‘They basically created synthetic exosomes with longer RNA sequences containing several genes they attribute to various fake viruses which are associated with diseases like hepatitis C and SARS. This is a so-called chimera. If this were included in a vaccine, i.e. injected, it could cause all sorts of health issues. It is basically an RNA vaccine that will make our own cells express these “virus” genes. The consequences of this are unknown but ominous.’
“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.” George Orwell
“Anyone who believes anything the US government says is gullible beyond the meaning of the word.” –Paul Craig Roberts, 2014
Quote from the following article:
ANOTHER key architect of the COVID PCR test had no coronavirus; the whole fake COVID house is falling down…
READ WHAT THIS STUDY SAYS. These quotes should be engraved in stone above the entrance to a museum dedicated to the history of medical fraud.
“We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available.”
TRANSLATION: We want to develop a test to detect the new COVID virus without having the virus.
“Here we present a validated diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV, its design relying on close genetic relatedness of 2019-nCoV with SARS coronavirus, making use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.”
TRANSLATION: We HAVE developed a diagnostic test to detect the new COVID virus. We ASSUME this new virus is closely related to an older coronavirus. We ASSUME we know HOW it is related. We ASSUME, because we don’t have the new COVID virus. Therefore, all our assumptions are made out of nothing. Actually, we have no proof there is a new coronavirus.
“The workflow reliably detects 2019-nCoV, and further discriminates 2019-nCoV from SARS-CoV.”
TRANSLATION: Our new test to detect the new virus? We don’t have the new virus. We’ve never observed it. We can’t study it directly. There is no proof it exists. But we will use the test to detect it.
The study is titled, “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR.” [Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan;25(3):2000045. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045.]
Those quotes from the study are astounding. A diagnostic test for the virus, but there is no virus. No standard against which to compare the reliability of the test…