Also see:
“How They’ll Fake the Success of the COVID Vaccine”
For purposes of lockdowns and general clampdowns [12], to promote more fear and punish areas where the economy is “too open,” a reverse-technique can be applied:
Make PCR tests adjust their cycles UPWARD, thus producing huge numbers of positive results and “new cases.”
“Well, in South Dakota, we have to mandate at least 100,000 more vaccinations in each of the following ‘hot spots,’ where case numbers have suddenly escalated. And we must lock down those areas immediately…”
Needless to say, any and all serious harm and death caused by the vaccine anywhere will be attributed to “the pandemic disease.”
And there you have it. Simple, brutal, criminal, and controlled from the federal level. A strategy for making it seem the COVID vaccine is effective, and saved the day…
SARS-CoV-2 Has Not Been Proven To Exist; I Can Do This Forever:
First of all, very high praise goes to Christine Massey, for her work in exposing the coronavirus fraud. In a half-sane world, she would have received many awards by now.
Her latest communication reads: “Freedom of Information reveals Public Health Agency of Canada has no record of ‘SARS-COV-2’ isolation performed by anyone, anywhere, ever” [1]
I urge readers to visit Massey’s site and read her new article and follow all the links. Her findings are stunning. She and her team have made about 40 FOI requests to public health agencies in various countries, requesting proof that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated. You’ll see from the responses that not one agency has records demonstrating isolation.
This means exactly what it seems to mean: the virus has not been proven to exist.
As for the people who keep chanting that the virus has been isolated, I can keep explaining why this is not so. I can do this forever. [2] [3]…
DB Note: I can do this forever, as well, or at least until I am taken away by the medical-gestapo!
****
In the magical universe there are no coincidences and there are no accidents. nothing happens unless someone wills it to happen”
~ William S. Burroughs“The true terrorists of our world do not meet at the docks at midnight, or scream “Allahu Akbar” before some violent action. The true terrorists of our world wear 5000 dollar suits and work in the highest positions of finance, government and business.”
~ Peter Joseph, “Zeitgeist: Addendum”. Documentary, History, War, http://www.imdb.com. 2008.“Insanity in individuals is something rare – but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule.”
~ Friedrich Nietzsche–Beyond Good and Evil Ch. 4
****
Quote from the following article:
The World Health Organization released a guidance memo on December 14th, warning that high cycle thresholds on PCR tests will result in false positives.
While this information is accurate, it has also been available for months, so we must ask: why are they reporting it now? Is it to make it appear the vaccine works?… (emphasis mine)
[…]
This new WHO memo states that using a high CT value to test for the presence of Sars-Cov-2 will result in false-positive results.
To quote their own words [our emphasis]:
“Users of RT-PCR reagents should read the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is necessary to account for any background noise which may lead to a specimen with a high cycle threshold (Ct) value result being interpreted as a positive result…”
[…]
That PCR tests were easily manipulated and potentially highly inaccurate has been one of the oft-repeated battle cries of those of us opposing the “pandemic” narrative, and the policies it’s being used to sell.
Many articles have been written about it, by many experts in the field, medical journalists and other researchers. It’s been commonly available knowledge, for months now, that any test using a CT value over 35 is potentially meaningless.
Dr Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR process, was clear that it wasn’t meant as a diagnostic tool, saying:
“with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.”
And, commenting on cycle thresholds, once said:
“If you have to go more than 40 cycles to amplify a single-copy gene, there is something seriously wrong with your PCR…”
And yet, the CDC demands that these worthless PCR tests be run at “40 CYCLES OR MORE”! So what should this tell you, little sheep to the slaughter? It should tell you, if you have a functioning mind left, that the CDC wants to use this worthless PCR test to crank up the number of CV-19 cases, so its inbred owners and controllers can have their way, while the rest of us rot in this continual despotic-hell on earth.
Did you also know that the CDC has stopped counting other types of flu strains this year? And this, of course, means that all flu cases will now be labeled COVID-19. Just to clarify, little [not-too-bright] sheep, this is a criminal manipulation, a criminal fabrication, a criminal mind screw!
Everything cancelled and destroyed, including our lives, and all because of a boldfaced criminal-lie, which will go down in history as the worst crime ever to be perpetrated on humanity!
And add to this evidence that “sars-cov-2”, because of this worthless PCR test, has NEVER BEEN ISOLATED, PURIFIED AND IDENTIFIED, and therefore, “sars-cov-2” doesn’t even exist, according to legitimate science. Or in other words, “COVID-19”, which is the disease that is supposedly caused by “sars-cov-2”, does not exist!
Once again, little sheep to the slaughter, you have simply been mind screwed for the last ten months. And you continue to be mind-screwed, because you refuse to hear and accept the awful truth about this heinous of all lies. You evidently prefer to be under the thumb of an unscientific dictatorship, where you are told how, where and when to wipe your own ass, than be a responsible, self-sustained individual:
WHO (Finally) Admits PCR Tests Create False Positives
Warnings concerning high CT value of tests are months too late…so why are they appearing now? The potential explanation is shockingly cynical.
Kit Knightly
The World Health Organization released a guidance memo on December 14th, warning that high cycle thresholds on PCR tests will result in false positives.
While this information is accurate, it has also been available for months, so we must ask: why are they reporting it now? Is it to make it appear the vaccine works?
The “gold standard” Sars-Cov-2 tests are based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR works by taking nucleotides – tiny fragments of DNA or RNA – and replicating them until they become something large enough to identify. The replication is done in cycles, with each cycle doubling the amount of genetic material. The number of cycles it takes to produce something identifiable is known as the “cycle threshold” or “CT value”. The higher the CT value, the less likely you are to be detecting anything significant.
This new WHO memo states that using a high CT value to test for the presence of Sars-Cov-2 will result in false-positive results.
To quote their own words [our emphasis]:
Users of RT-PCR reagents should read the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is necessary to account for any background noise which may lead to a specimen with a high cycle threshold (Ct) value result being interpreted as a positive result.
They go on to explain [again, our emphasis]:
The design principle of RT-PCR means that for patients with high levels of circulating virus (viral load), relatively few cycles will be needed to detect virus and so the Ct value will be low. Conversely, when specimens return a high Ct value, it means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.
Of course, none of this is news to anyone who has been paying attention. That PCR tests were easily manipulated and potentially highly inaccurate has been one of the oft-repeated battle cries of those of us opposing the “pandemic” narrative, and the policies it’s being used to sell.
Many articles have been written about it, by many experts in the field, medical journalists and other researchers. It’s been commonly available knowledge, for months now, that any test using a CT value over 35 is potentially meaningless.
Dr Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR process, was clear that it wasn’t meant as a diagnostic tool, saying:
with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.”
And, commenting on cycle thresholds, once said:
If you have to go more than 40 cycles to amplify a single-copy gene, there is something seriously wrong with your PCR.”
The MIQE guidelines for PCR use state:
Cq values higher than 40 are suspect because of the implied low efficiency and generally should not be reported,”
The 94% will never get to hear/read/see this info: 5%+1% keep it well out of sight …
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes! That’s why we need to keep doing this!
LikeLike